Legal Opinion

Ursula Ungaro-Benages v. Dresdner Bank AG

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 3, 2004No. 03-11880PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant, Ursula Ungaro-Be-nages, filed suit against two German banks, Dresdner Bank and Deutsche Bank, to recover assets from her family’s estate. The plaintiff alleges that the banks, through the Nazi Regime’s program of “Aryanization,” stole her family’s interest in its manufacturing company, Orenstein & Koppel (“O&K”). The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant banks on multiple grounds, including the political question doctrine, international comity, statute of limitations and failure to state a claim. For the reasons that follow, we…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Alperin v. Vatican BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. National Industries Group v. Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  5. GDG Acquisitions, LLC v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API