Legal Opinion

Garvin v. Glisson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLea, J.

The plaintiff in error was Chairman ■of the Board of Registration Commissioners of Shelby County, and the defendant in error, W. B. •Glisson, who was a candidate for office, requested of Garvin a copy or list of the registered voters of the city of Memphis, there being ten wards in the city. The copy was furnished, and the price charged was paid under protest, the defendant in error thinking it more than was proper or allowable by law.

Afterward ten suits were brought against Gar-vin to recover so much of the amount paid as was thought to be unlawful. Ten several judgments were, rendered…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fraser v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Kerr v. RainesTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API