Legal Opinion

Spaunhorst v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1937No. 10725PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAR1S, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, as the beneficiary in a policy of accident insurance, issued by the appellee on the life of one Louis C. T. Spaunhorst, brought suit thereon to recover the sum of $5,000, on the theory that the conceded death of the insured therein had been caused by injuries accidentally incurred. More accurately speaking, the contract of insurance was against death from any cause, but in the event that death was caused by accident, as this word was defined and limited in the policy, double indemnity, to wit, $10,000 was to be paid to the beneficiary. The so-called principal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Kerns v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burne v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Kirk v. Financial Security Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. First National Bank of Malden v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  5. Hawes v. Kansas Farm BureauSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API