Legal Opinion

Minton v. Lichtenstein

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1972No. 34389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Chief Judge.

This is a suit to enforce by means of a mandatory injunction a fence restriction in a subdivision indenture. Finding that it was waived, relinquished, and abandoned, the trial court refused to enforce the covenant and plaintiffs, trustees of Forest Green Estates, appealed.

Sub-paragraph 10(h) of the main indenture governing Forest Green Estates prohibits the erection of fences unless the trustees first give their written approval: “No fence, except hedge fences, or other enclosure, and no retaining walls shall be erected upon any lot within said subdivision unless the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake Development Enterprises, Inc. v. KojetinskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Swain v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Gibbs v. CassMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Eichelsbach v. HardingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Compton Hill Improvement Co. v. StrauchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cypress Gardens, Ltd. v. PlattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Lake Saint Louis Community Association v. KamperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Melson v. GuilfoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Terre Du Lac Property Owners' Ass'n v. WidemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Kuhs v. KawelaskeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API