Legal Opinion

United States v. Long

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided August 11, 1978No. NCM 78 0446PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREGORY, Judge:

In his single assignment of error on appeal, appellant alleges that his court-martial lacked jurisdiction over him because misconduct on the part of his recruiter produced a fraudulent enlistment.

The record of trial reveals that appellant enlisted in the United States Marine Corps Reserve (Class “J”) on 15 January 1975. He was discharged from this Reserve enlistment on 10 February 1975, and on 11 February 1975 he enlisted in the United States Marine Corps and came on active duty. Appellant testified that, prior to his Reserve enlistment, his recruiter provided him the list of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. LittleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. CookU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. WarrenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. WarrenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API