Legal Opinion
(HC) Reed v. State of California
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 28, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03524Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARD K. REED, Case No. 2:24-cv-3524-JDP (P) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner brings this action under section 2254. ECF No. 2. After review of the petition, 19 I find that it fails to state a cognizable federal habeas claim. I will dismiss the petition with leave 20 to amend. Additionally, I will grant petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF 21 No. 5, and deny his motion for default judgment, ECF No. 6. 22 The petition is before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.