Legal Opinion

State v. Kuhn

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 26, 1972No. 621-2PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

— The defendant, Charles Kuhn, appeals from a judgment and sentence following revocation of probation under a deferred sentence,. The first impression issue on appeal is whether the exclusionary rules of the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution are applicable to a probation revocation hearing; specifically, whether the trial court erred in reyoking defendant’s deferred sentence by allowing into evidence various stolen items discovered in a warrantless search of defendant’s apartment. We hold that the exclusionary rules are not applicable to a revocation of probation hearing.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  2. U. S. Ex Rel. Lombardino v. HeydDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  3. United States v. Terrell Henry HallmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  4. People v. HaykoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. State v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. United States v. Gerald Duane VandemarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. People v. DoweryIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. State v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API