Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Mountain Laurel Assurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 2000No. 903 WDA 1999PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Mountain Laurel Assurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Progressive Corporation and Progressive Insurance Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Progressive”), appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Appellees, Kelly and Linda Morrison, in the amount of $100,000 for punitive damages based upon a finding that Appellants acted in bad faith. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this memorandum. The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are as follows.

¶2 In January…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MGA Insurance v. BakosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cresswell v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Ridolfi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Ettinger & Associates, LLC v. Hartford/Twin City Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Smith v. Windsor GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Cresswell v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API