Legal Opinion

Winter v. Winter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1983No. Civ. 10393PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

After Barbara and Leonard Winter were divorced, Leonard moved for a new trial on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence. Leonard appeals from the denial of his motion and from the portion of the judgment concerning property division. Leonard contends that the property distribution was inequitable because the court included in the marital estate all of Leonard’s inherited and gifted property. He also contends that the court erred in failing to use any language that indicates consideration of the Ruff-Fischer guidelines. We affirm.

The record does not show that either…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nastrom v. NastromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fine v. FineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Grant v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Fraase v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Svetenko v. SvetenkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Routledge v. RoutledgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hogan v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API