State v. Strauch
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
{1} The State of New Mexico appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for a protective order. The question presented is whether Defendant has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent others from disclosing, confidential communications he made to a licensed social worker for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment. We conclude that Defendant has this privilege pursuant to Rule 11-504 NMRA and can thus prevent both his social worker and his ex-wife from disclosing information he communicated during counseling sessions. In arriving at this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gooch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. NICK R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- McClellan v. Health Maintenace OrganizationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. StrauchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. StrauchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DinapoliNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. DinapoliNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Hammack v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.