Babcock v. Rose
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert G. Hurlbutt, J.
In a proceeding under CPLR article 78, petitioners seek review of respondents’ determination that under the regulations of the Department of Social Services, their children were ineligible for Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) benefits for a period of three months after a child in the family unit became categorically ineligible.
The facts are undisputed. Petitioner Babcock resides with her daughter Nicole, her boyfriend Scott Teller, and a child Zachary who is the common child of petitioner and Teller. Babcock received assistance for a household of four…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lumpkin v. Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Scoglio v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bosh v. FaheyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mabb v. ToiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Evans v. GardnerNew York Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.