Legal Opinion

City of Winfield v. Hackney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 12, 1912No. 17,980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The city prosecuted the defendant for harboring a dog in violation of an ordinance, and upon appeal from conviction in police court it was held by the district court that the ordinance was void and the complaint was quashed. From this ruling the city appeals, and the principal question concerns the validity of the ordinance.

The statute (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 1395) authorizes the council of a city of the second class to regulate and prohibit the running at large of certain animals and to impound such as may be found running at large, and also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. City of Kansas v. OvertonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Stebbins v. MayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Clark v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Wichita v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. DePriest v. CampSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API