Legal Opinion

Clark v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Wallace District Court. On the 11th day of December, 1893, S. H. H. Clark, Oliver W. Mink, E. Ellery Anderson, J. W. Doane and F. R. Coudert brought this action, as receivers of the Union Pacific Railway Company, to restrain the board of county commissioners and the treasurer of Wallace county from collecting a special or extra levy of 10 mills on the dollar’s valuation of the Union Pacific property in that county, and to prevent the board from issuing warrants…

Read the full summary

Error from Wallace District Court. On the 11th day of December, 1893, S. H. H. Clark, Oliver W. Mink, E. Ellery Anderson, J. W. Doane and F. R. Coudert brought this action, as receivers of the Union Pacific Railway Company, to restrain the board of county commissioners and the treasurer of Wallace county from collecting a special or extra levy of 10 mills on the dollar’s valuation of the Union Pacific property in that county, and to prevent the board from issuing warrants for payment of bounties on wolf, coyote, rabbit and gopher scalps. At that time a temporary injunction was granted.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hobton, C. J.:

The board of commissioners of. Wallace county claims authority to pay a bounty on gopher scalps by virtue of the provisions of chapter 87, Laws of .1871 (Gen. Stat. of 1889, ¶ 1890). The title of the act is as follows: “An act to protect fruit trees, hedge plants, and fences.” The act authorizes “the county commissioners of any county of this state to pay a premium for gopher scalps taken in their county, not to exceed 20 cents for each scalp.” There is nothing in the body of the act referring to fruit trees, hedge plants, or fences. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comm'rs of Sedgwick County v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Board of Commissioners v. WinkleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of Winfield v. HackneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API