Legal Opinion

Patton v. Clegg

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1921No. 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by John G. Patton and Harry P. Sayford, trading as the Sayford Paper Specialty Company, against E. T. Clegg and the Vendig Hotel Company.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

[1] This cause concerns itself with letters patent No. 1,301,596, issued April 22, 1919, to John G. Patton, for a paper lining for finger bowls. The title is in the plaintiffs by ownership of the patent in one and an exclusive license in the other. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case in chief there was a motion to dismiss as against the defendant Clegg on the ground of the absence of any evidence that he had made, used, or vended the patented utensil. If this motion prevails, the Hotel Vendig is left as the sole defendant. This calls for a word of explanation.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. RidderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  2. F. E. Fonseca & Co. v. Ruy Suarez & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Wrinkle, Inc. v. FritzDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1939
  2. Straight Side Basket Corporation v. KullDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API