Legal Opinion

Pacific Express Co. v. Needham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Eobertson. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Scott.

1Opinion of the Court

EIDSON, Associate Justice.

The statement of the nature and result of the suit given by appellant in its brief is concurred in by appellee and is adopted by this court, and is as follows:

"The appellees instituted this spit in the District Court of Robertson County, Texas, on the 13th day of November, 1903', against the appellant to recover damages laid in the ad damnum clause at $1,935, for breach of a special contract for the shipment of fruit trees from Waco, Texas, by the terms of which the appellant was alleged to have bound itself to forward the trees by a certain train, and deliver them…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. WoolumTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Crawford v. Saunders Bro.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Brown v. Abilene National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. AikenTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. RiddleDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1923
  2. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Ft. Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. EddlemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API