St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Woolum
Texas Supreme Court
Ho statement is necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
COLLARD, Judge,
Section A. — Suit by appellee Woolum, against appellant St. Louis & San Francisco Bailway Company, for damages for injuries received while in the discharge of his duties as brakeman in the employ of defendant.
Plaintiff was on a car which with others had been put in motion and cut from the engine, and were to be delivered to the Pacific Bailway Company — all in the city of Paris, Texas. When the car plaintiff was on reached the crossing on the Santa Fe railway, because of a defect in the crossing it jumped the track. Plaintiff was tripped offj and fell about fifteen feet,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. GageTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Baldessore v. StephanesTexas Supreme Court · 1864
- Brown v. Abilene National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Hogan v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
- Carver Bros. v. MerrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Consumers' Lignite Co. v. HubnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Crouch v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.