Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Woolum

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1892No. 7267PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge,

Section A. — Suit by appellee Woolum, against appellant St. Louis & San Francisco Bailway Company, for damages for injuries received while in the discharge of his duties as brakeman in the employ of defendant.

Plaintiff was on a car which with others had been put in motion and cut from the engine, and were to be delivered to the Pacific Bailway Company — all in the city of Paris, Texas. When the car plaintiff was on reached the crossing on the Santa Fe railway, because of a defect in the crossing it jumped the track. Plaintiff was tripped offj and fell about fifteen feet,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. GageTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Baldessore v. StephanesTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Brown v. Abilene National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hogan v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Carver Bros. v. MerrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Consumers' Lignite Co. v. HubnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Crouch v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API