Keith v. The City of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEBRA A. KEITH, Case No.: 21CV1782-JAH-JLB 12 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN 13 v. PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 14 THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Pending before the Court is the City of San Diego’s (“Defendant” or the “City”) 19 motion to dismiss the complaint. (ECF No. 8). The motion has been fully briefed. (ECF 20 Nos. 8, 16, 17). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court GRANTS in part 21 and DENIES in part Defendant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.