Legal Opinion
State v. Allen
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 2006No. 31096, 31097, 31098PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This appeal arises from three cases involving forgery and checks issued with insufficient funds. The defendant, Timothy Lee Allen, contends that the State breached the plea agreement for the first two eases, that the district court abused its discretion in imposing the sentences in those cases, and that the district court erred in denying a Rule 35 motion to reduce his sentences in all three cases.
I
FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This consolidated appeal involves three separate but related criminal proceedings. The first two, Docket Nos. 31096 and 31097, although not formally…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ShaferIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. RodriguezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Raymond Stuart NienburgIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. HalbeslebenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.