Legal Opinion

Glahn v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, order denying defendant’s motion (Rules Civ. Prae. rule 106, subd. 5) to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The terms of the writing dated December 13, 1929, signed by appellant, which letter the respondent in his brief asserts is the contract between, the parties, determined their rights notwithstanding the allegations of the com-! plaint which purport to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Pershall v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Sonino v. MagriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Red Robin Stores, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Dorn v. DornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Venables v. SagonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API