Legal Opinion

Sorken v. Epstein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1954No. Appeal, No. 253PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

On a bill of complaint charging, inter alia, misappropriation of the funds of Epstein & Sorken, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, by Simon Epstein, the president of the company, the court below appointed a receiver for the company. The receiver later petitioned the court for an order, requiring Epstein to pay. to him the. amount of the moneys of the company allegedly *638improperly withdrawn. Epstein filed a responsive answer, denying the receiver’s allegations of misappropriation. Both parties offered supporting depositions and, after argument, the court below entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayer v. BrimmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Friel v. BeadleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. In Re Inter-County BridgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. American Soda Water Co. v. TaggartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Scott v. American Container Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API