Legal Opinion

Giles v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 20, 2012No. Civil Action No. ELH-12-634PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge.

Jimmie Giles, plaintiff, is a former professional football player with the National Football League. Accordingly, he is a beneficiary of the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan is an employee pension benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 *703(“ERISA”), codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. It was established pursuant to collective bargaining agreements between the NFL Players Association and the NFL Management Council in order to provide retirement,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krysztofiak v. Boston Mutual Life Insurance Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  2. Vetter v. Am. Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API