Gustafson v. Riggs
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
This appeal requires an interpretation of a statute giving preference to certain contractors in bids on public work. The lower court held that both competing contractors, B. L. Gustafson and Lester E. Jackson, met the preference requirements of this statute and that therefore the award of the bid to the lowest bidder, Jackson, was proper.
The statutory language controlling this controversy is:
“B. In awarding the contract for work to be paid for from public funds, bids of contractors who have satisfactorily performed prior public contracts, and who have paid state and county taxes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Aetna Insurance v. KleinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. KleinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Schrey v. Allison Steel Mfg. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Leigh v. SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Payne v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Johnson v. University HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- D. C. Speer Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Hanson's Water Works Supply Co. v. DriggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Taraska v. TaraskaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019