Legal Opinion

Williams v. Finlayson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This case was decided by Division B. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Jackson County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiffs in error replevied certain merchandise from the defendant in error, who was sheriff of Jackson county. To the declaration a plea of not guiltj was filed, issue joined there on and at the Fall term, 1903, a trial was had and a verdict and judgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiffs in error seek to reverse this judgment.

*266The first assignment of error is based on the refusal of the trial court to give the following instruction to the jury: “If the seller, Hutto, was the head of a family and sold his entire property to any one, which property would have been exempt to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Springfield Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1885
  2. Ballard v. Eckman & VetsburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1884
  3. Kansas Moline Plow Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Post v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  5. Henry Gassett & Co. v. Wilson & BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1850

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Jackson v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Jacksonville Bulls Football, Ltd. v. BlattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Cerna v. Swiss Bank Corp.(Overseas), SADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. United States v. RomanoDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API