Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony J. Bucci, Sr. And Ronald H. Glantz
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 25, 1988No. 87-1271PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
On October 25, 1985, a grand jury returned an indictment charging defendants Ronald Glantz and Anthony J. Bucci with conspiracy to commit extortion (Count I) and extortion (Count II) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act). 1 At the time of the alleged extortion, Glantz was City Solicitor of Providence, and Bucci was an attorney in private practice. Bucci’s brother-in-law, Clement Cesaro, was then director of the Providence Department of Public Works, a position he obtained with Bucci’s assistance. After a three-week trial, a jury found appellants guilty of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Augustus John Camelio v. American Federation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Rivera-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. UrbanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Anthony Esparsen, United States of America v. Kelly Esparsen, United States of America v. Robert McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.