Legal Opinion

People v. Julian R.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2009No. S159282PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

When a minor within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court is committed to California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice, the juvenile court is required to indicate the maximum period of physical confinement. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 726, subd. (c).) In setting that confinement period, which may be less than, but not more than, the prison sentence that could be imposed on an adult convicted of the same crime, the court must consider the “facts and circumstances” of the crime. (§731, subd. (c).)

This case presents two issues: First, must…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re PodestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. StowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. Jacob J.California Court of Appeal · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. NucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. VelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. Vela, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. A.R. (In re A.R.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. C.W.California Court of Appeal · 2012

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API