Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 2000No. 23150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.

The Director of Revenue (“Director”), appeals the judgment of the circuit court finding that Paul A. Sutton (“Petitioner”), did not unequivocally refuse to submit to a chemical test as prescribed by section 577.041.1 and ordering the reinstatement of petitioner’s license to operate a motor vehicle. See generally § 577.041. 1

In his sole point relied on, Director maintains that the trial court erred in setting aside the revocation of Petitioner’s license to operate a motor vehicle. He maintains that at trial he had proven all the elements necessary to revoke Petitioner’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. McMaster v. LohmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Pierson v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Duffy v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jarrell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Wilson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Furne v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. St. Pierre v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Kisselev v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API