Legal Opinion
Walter v. Bauer
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
Joseph P. Kuszynski, J.
In this motion to renew and reargue, plaintiffs John Walter as father and natural guardian of Christopher Walter, an infant, and John Walter, individually, seek to amend the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3025 to increase the ad damnum clause from $125,000 to $600,000 and to add a cause of action in strict liability in tort.
The infant plaintiff, Christopher Walter, allegedly sustained injury to his eye in October, 1975 at Our Lady of Pompeii School where he was a student, while performing a science experiment with a ruler and rubber bands. The experiment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- City of Watertown v. RoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Gisondi v. Town of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Lycett v. Niagara Frontier Transit Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilhelm Winter Cynthia Zheng v. G.P. Putnam's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Daniel v. Dow Jones & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
- Howard v. Poseidon Pools, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1986
- Beasock v. Dioguardi Enterprises, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1985
- Gorran v. Atkins Nutritionals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.