Legal Opinion
Howard v. Poseidon Pools, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1986PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward M. Horey, J.
The motion is for summary judgment. It is brought by the defendant National Spa Pool Institute (hereinafter referred to as NSPI). That institute acts as a manufacturers’ trade association for swimming pools. It is alleged that among its functions is certifying swimming pools and equipment together with reviewing such equipment and recommending changes in design. In contrast to such organizations as Consumers Reports, NSPI is an organization representing the interests of manufacturers.
The action which the plaintiffs have brought against NSPI and several…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Garcia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- King v. National Spa and Pool InstituteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Brumbaugh v. CEJJ, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Bailey v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Howard v. Poseidon Pools, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.