Legal Opinion

State v. Perez

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 26, 2000No. 99-3108-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin appeals an order of the circuit court concluding that Carlos Perez, who was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon, did not "use" a weapon while committing that crime and thus is entitled to return of the weapons under WlS. STAT. § 968.20(lm)(b) (1997-98).1 The State argues that if a person commits a crime while "with" a firearm, the firearm may be seized and not returned to the owner. We disagree that this is the proper interpretation of the word "use" as it exists in the statute. We affirm the circuit court.

¶ 2. The necessary facts are few and uncomplicated.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CurielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Grosse v. Protective Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lomax v. FiedlerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PerezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  3. State v. PerezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API