Legal Opinion

Craig v. Partridge

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1929No. 5249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WM. A. BABCOCK, Commissioner.

— rThis action was brought by the respondents in the district court of Canyon county against the defendants, H. A. Partridge, appellant, and H. Craig, to quiet title to certain real property, situated in Canyon county.

The complaint set out two causes of action: The first relating to a certain tract of land in what is known as Kurtz Addition to Nampa, Idaho; the second covering lots in Arlington Addition to Nampa, Idaho.

In both causes of action the respondent, Edith L. Craig, claimed title to the land in question as her sole and separate property.

Plaintiffs Dean,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sterrett v. SweeneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. McMillan v. McMillanIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Rogers v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Littler v. JefferisIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fross v. WottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Buhl State Bank v. GlanderIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Norton v. BlenkironCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Kirkpatrick v. TowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Brummund v. RomigIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API