Legal Opinion

United States v. Ekco Housewares, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 28, 1994No. 5:92CV1245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

MATIA, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Both before and after the effective date of the regulations promulgated pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901, et seq., which is November 19, 1980, and until at least June 5, 1984, Ekco discharged wastewaters, containing hazardous wastes, from its operations to the surface impoundment located at the Massillon facility and treated, stored or disposed of those hazardous wastes in the surface impoundment located at its facility.

2. The RCRA financial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Student Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth, in 86-5927 v. At & T Bell Laboratories, in 86-5895Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Chesapeake Foundation v. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
  5. United States (EPA) v. Environmental Waste Control, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ekco Housewares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Cornerstone Realty, Inc. v. Dresser Rand Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  3. United States v. GurleyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API