Muhammad v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtPhillip T. Whiteaker, Judge
1 ¶ Appellant Kareem Muhammad was convicted of one count of robbery and one count of theft of property following a bench trial. Because Muhammad had nine previous convictions, he was sentenced as a habitual offender and received twelve years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, Muhammad raises three arguments: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for robbery; (2) in conjunction with that argument, Arkansas’s standard of review in criminal cases is unconstitutional and inconsistent with Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017