Carroll v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
Matthew George Carroll stands convicted by a Harrison County jury for the state jail felony of delivery of a controlled substance.1 No motion for new trial was filed. On appeal, he asserts only that his trial counsel was ineffective because of allegedly inadequate questioning during voir dire of the jury panel. In light of the lack of any post-trial motion or hearing on the issue of trial counsel’s performance, Carroll creatively asks only that we send the matter back to the trial court for a hearing on the effectiveness of trial counsel. Because there…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.