Legal Opinion

Carroll v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 2012No. 06-11-00225-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

Matthew George Carroll stands convicted by a Harrison County jury for the state jail felony of delivery of a controlled substance.1 No motion for new trial was filed. On appeal, he asserts only that his trial counsel was ineffective because of allegedly inadequate questioning during voir dire of the jury panel. In light of the lack of any post-trial motion or hearing on the issue of trial counsel’s performance, Carroll creatively asks only that we send the matter back to the trial court for a hearing on the effectiveness of trial counsel. Because there…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kristen Marie Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  2. Raul Resendez Herrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API