Legal Opinion

Wright v. Richland County School District Two

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 23, 1997No. 24637PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

Imogene Wright (Wright) appeals an order of the circuit court finding she is not entitled to a lump sum retirement incentive bonus offered by Respondent, Richland County School District Two (District). We affirm.

FACTS

In 1993, as part of the Appropriations Act, the Legislature enacted Proviso 17P.6 (Proviso), giving South Carolina public employers the option of adopting a one-time retirement incentive bonus. It provides, in pertinent part:

[A]ny ... school district ... may elect to offer a one-time lump sum payment of 25% of the employee’s budgeted base salary or $7500 whichever…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Town of Hilton Head Island v. Fine Liquors, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Hospitality Ass'n of South Carolina, Inc. v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. McAbee v. Southern Rwy. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. City of Charleston v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnhill v. City of North Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Wrenn Bail Bond Service, Inc. v. City of HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API