Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. Cafesjian
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
The above-captioned consolidated actions involve a series of claims and counterclaims relating to the parties’ attempts to create a museum and memorial in Washington, D.C. devoted to the Armenian Genocide. 1 Following a twelve-day bench trial in November 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law on January 26, 2011. See [193] 2 Mem. Op. (Jan. 26, 2011). The Court found that none of the parties’ substantive claims were meritorious and dismissed all of the claims save one,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Armenian Assembly of America v. Gerard CafesjianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Waters v. Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. CafesjianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. CafesjianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Waters v. Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.