Legal Opinion
State v. Rhinehart
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 29, 2006No. 20050553-CAPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENWOOD, Associate Presiding Judge:
{1 Defendant Tamara Rhinehart was con-viected after a jury trial of burglary, a second degree felony, in violation of Utah Code seetion 76-6-202, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-202 (2003), and theft, a second degree felony, in violation of Utah Code section 76-6-404. See id. § 76-6-404 (2008). She appeals from the (1) denial of her motion to quash bind-over, (2) overruling of her objection to the order of trials, and (8) overruling of her objection to the use of hearsay evidence at trial. We affirm. 1
BACKGROUND 2
12 Sometime after June 5, 2008, Defendant and her…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. TimmermanUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Gresham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.