Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Bank of Edenton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

As to the damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the unlawful and wrongful seizure and purchase at a grossly inadequate price of the assets of the Edenton Lumber Company, it is clear that if such damages were incurred they were incurred directly by the corporation, and only indirectly by the plaintiff as a stockholder. With certain exceptions, into which this case does not fall, a stockholder cannot maintain an action in his own name for damages suffered by a corporation in the absence of an allegation that he had made effort to have the officers and directors of the corporation,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merrimon v. Paving Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Lloyd v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Moore v. Silver Valley Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Bean v. Home Detective Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Ham v. NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bledsoe v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Bledsoe v. Coxe Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. McGuinn v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API