Legal Opinion

Callas v. S&P Global Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 26, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01478Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WILLIAM CALLAS, THOMAS CASSESE, and NATALIE FERD, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM OPINION -against- 19 Civ. 1478 (PGG) S&P GLOBAL INC., Defendant. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiffs William Callas, Thomas Cassese, and Natalie Ferd – former employees of Defendant S&P Global, Inc. (“S&P”)1 – bring this action against S&P pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq., challenging Defendant’s denial of their claims for severance benefits. Defendant contends that Plaintiffs are not entitled to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API