Legal Opinion

In Re Kapp

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 7, 2004No. 17-50249PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtors Matthew and Kelly Kapp filed a motion to suspend their Chapter 13 plan payments, and GMAC Mortgage Corporation (GMAC) objected, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2). This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) over which the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b), 157(a), and 157(b)(1). The following constitutes my Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in accordance with Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as made applicable to this proceeding by Rule 7052 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  2. In Re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1989
  3. In Re PalazzoloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  4. Central Bank of the South v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1990
  5. Harris v. Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. (In Re Harris)District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martens v. Countrywide Home Loans (In Re Martens)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. In re Brian T.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  3. Patsy Lee Martens v. Countrywide LoansUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API