Legal Opinion

Tate v. Sartain

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1990No. 9800PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Appellants complain of a trial court judgment declaring an instrument to be a release of vendor’s lien. They assert that the instrument, which is from Lon Smith to John Cousins, is a quitclaim deed of all Smith’s interest in the land it describes, including a mineral interest which Smith previously reserved in a deed to James McCannon. Appellees contend that the instrument was only a release of the vendor’s lien securing the notes which McCan-non gave Smith for the purchase price of the land, and did not convey the previously reserved mineral interest. We find that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. McEntireTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Sanborn v. Crowdus Brothers Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Carminati v. FenoglioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Armstrong v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linda Ann Parrish Richardson and Gary Bruce Richardson, Co-Trustees of the M.C. Parrish, Jr. Testamentary Trust v. Donald Roger MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Linda Ann Parrish Richardson and Gary Bruce Richardson, Co-Trustees of the M.C. Parrish, Jr. Testamentary Trust v. Donald Roger Mills, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
  3. Linda Ann Parrish Richardson and Gary Bruce Richardson, Co-Trustees of the M.C. Parrish, Jr. Testamentary Trust v. Donald Roger Mills, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2016
  4. Linda Ann Parrish Richardson and Gary Bruce Richardson, Co-Trustees of the M.C. Parrish, Jr. Testamentary Trust v. Donald Roger Mills, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API