Ebling v. Otto Nielsen
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered March 7, 1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages sustained in an automobile collision, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought to recover for damages to respondent’s automobile on account of a rear-end collision with a large motor truck belonging to appellants. The case was tried without a jury. The court made findings and conclusions to the effect that the collision was caused by the negligence of ap*356pellants and entered judgment accordingly, from which the appeal is taken.
Appellants contend the weight of the evidence dismisses them from the charge of negligence and affirmatively and clearly establishes contributory negligence which denies respondent any right of recovery. Appellants are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Fluhart v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Engelker v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- McEvilla v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Ballard v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Flohr v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Haines v. CarrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.