Legal Opinion

Garber v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1992No. S-89-1338PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

The district court affirmed the order of the Nebraska Motor Vehicle Industry Licensing Board, which terminated the franchise agreements between the respondent-appellant franchisee, Lloyd F. Garber, doing business as Garber’s Honda, Fairbury, Nebraska, and the applicant-appellee franchisor, American Honda Motor Company, Inc., “effective when a replacement dealer is found and the Board is notified” by American Honda. We dismiss.

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-1420(1) (Reissue 1988) provides that, except under conditions not present in this case,

no franchisor shall terminate or refuse to continue any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of RGNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Fritch v. FritchNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bredehoft v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Schaad v. SimmsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lemburg Through Lemburg v. Adams CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. WBE Co. v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Department of Social Services v. C.B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kroll v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Northern States Beef v. StennisNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API