West v. Carolina Housing & Mortgage Corp.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. “One having the capacity and opportunity to read a written contract, and who signs it, not under any emergency, and whose signature is not obtained by any trick or artifice of the other party, can not afterwards set up fraud in the procurement of his signature to the instrument.” Truitt-Silvey Hat Co. v. Callaway & Truitt, 130 Ga. 637 (61 S. E. 481); Lewis v. Foy, 189 Ga. 596 (6 S. E. 2d 788).
2. The petitioners’ allegations, as finally amended, being that they were ignorant colored people, practically illiterate, and totally incapable of reading and understanding…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lewis v. FoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Truitt-Silvey Hat Co. v. Callaway & TruittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by20 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Cole v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Budget Charge Accounts, Inc. v. PetersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Carr v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.