Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Lederfine

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 18, 1943No. Civil 17-126PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

It is necessary to decide whether a judgment recovered by the plaintiff in this court, against each defendant in an action tried to a jury, is dischargeable in bankruptcy as to the defendant Murray Lederfine. He is a voluntary bankrupt and has pleaded his discharge as a special defense; the trustee has now moved to dismiss that defense in view of the verdict.

Whether this is the proper practice is relatively unimportant; the question is whether the debt is dischargeable, and it seems appropriate to decide that in connection with the judgment being entered on the verdict.

Th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. HerbstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. In Re BernardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. City of Syracuse v. RoscoeNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  4. In re ButtsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1903
  5. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. CovingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carey Lumber Company, a Corporation v. Thomas Hugh BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Stone v. Stone (In Re Stone)District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Bombardier Corp. v. Penning (In Re Penning)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  4. Matter of WhitlockDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978
  5. Hill v. Ozar (In Re Wholesale Furniture Mart, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API