Legal Opinion
In re Butts
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 27, 1903PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Motion for an injunction staying the American Agricultural Chemical Company, plaintiff, in an action pending in the Supreme Court of the state of New York against the bankrupt, James P. Butts, from prosecuting such action to judgment and enforcing same.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
In the month of October, 1901, the American Agricultural Chemical Company shipped and delivered to the said James P. Butts at Oneonta, N. Y., certain goods under and pursuant to the terms of certain agreements, partly printed and partly in writing (both being the same in terms, and therefore treated here as one), which provide as follows:
“We hereby agree to ship you, under the conditions and stipulations hereinafter named, the following fertilizers at prices and terms named below. The terms and conditions of this contract are as follows, and the prices named below are net…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Upshur v. BriscoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Frey v. TorreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Bracken v. MilnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1900
- In re BaschDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- Burnham v. PidcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Orndorff v. State Ex Rel. McGillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Bank Calumet v. Whiters (In Re Whiters)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
- Delange v. Tsikouris (In Re Tsikouris)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
- Cotton Belt Insurance v. Harrill (In Re Harrill)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.