Legal Opinion

Brussels v. Grand Union Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 24, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cukiam.

These two cases were tried together. The facts appear to be that Norman H. Brussels at the request of his mother, Fanny Brussels, and in her behalf, purchased canned peas for family use from the defendant grocery company. The proofs show that the peas, although properly prepared for a meal, made Mrs. Brussels ill; also her son, Leslie, and the maid of all work, Lucile Higgins. For the suffering caused by food poisoning they all had judgment. The defendant appeals.

The trial court found, as he could well do from the evidence, that the peas were unwholesome and not of merchantable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gearing v. BerksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Griffin v. James Butler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  3. Cassini v. Curtis Candy Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duncan v. JumanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Simon v. Graham BakeryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API