Legal Opinion
Ex parte Marshall
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 19, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Original.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The petitioner, A. C. Marshall, by his petition for the writ of habeas corpus filed here seeks relief from arrest by the Chief of Police of the City of Jacksonville under a warrant based on an affidavit charging him with operating an auto bus with a seating capacity of twelve persons on a public street of said city without having paid the license tax of fifty dollars required by ordinance No. C-4 of said city, approved August 13th, 1917.
*99The petition alleges that on November 21st, 1917, your petitioner as Manager of Orange Belt Auto Line, a copartnership composed of himself and K. C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Williams v. City of TalladegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LakinWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- San Benito County v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughes Transp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- North Dade Water Co. v. Florida State Turnpike Auth.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- State v. WilesWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Hughes Transp., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954