Commonwealth v. Meeks
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Casey Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Clarke
— Affirming.
The indictment herein attempts to charge appellee with a violation of section 2, chapter 43, Acts of the 1920 session of the legislature. A demurrer was sustained to the indictment and the Commonwealth has appealed from the judgment that followed, dismissing the indictment.
The section under which the indictment was drawn with omitted words supplied as indicated in Commonwealth v. Florence, 192 Ky. 236, reads:
“Every parent, guardian or other person residing within the boundaries of any county school district and *691having the custody, control or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dials v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Commonwealth v. L. &. N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Commonwealth v. McClanahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Commonwealth v. FlorenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marshall v. TullyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Rickman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Commonwealth v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Sigmon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- State v. PilkintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.