Legal Opinion

Eggeman v. Binford

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1951No. Civ. 18252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to two race horses and to require defendant to account for money advanced to him as plaintiff’s agent. Defendant answered and filed a cross-complaint, claiming a partnership interest in the horses and seeking reimbursement for $4,266.41 paid out for the use and benefit of plaintiff in keeping and racing the horses. Plaintiff had judgment quieting his title and for the sum of $1,374. Defendant appeals. Plaintiff has not filed a brief. Although we were not required to examine into the merits of the appeal (Berry v. Ryan, 97 Cal. App.2d 492 [217 P.2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Berry v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Denbo v. SennessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Swanson v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API