Legal Opinion

Baird v. Herrmann

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 21, 1987No. 73677, 73678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Margie Herrmann Baird obtained a divorce from Donald Herrmann in Michigan in 1977. Under the divorce decree, as modified in 1979, Herrmann was obligated to pay $66 weekly for the support of their two children. On February 14, 1982, in a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) action commenced by Baird in Michigan and pursued in Clayton County, Georgia, by the State of Georgia as responding state, the Clayton County Superior Court ordered Herrmann to pay $50 per week, effective December 14, 1981; in that order, the superior court also declared that “[n]o…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Winkle & Co. v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. State of Ga. v. McKennaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Levine v. SeleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Earley v. EarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Human Resources Ex Rel. Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. In Re PollockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Department of Human Resources v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API